Recently, another tragedy struck in Nigeria when a petrol tanker exploded in Jigawa, killing more than 90 people. Our prayers go out to the victims and their families, as we once again witness the devastating consequences of inadequate safety measures on Nigerian roads. However, beyond offering condolences, this incident raises a critical question: why do Nigeria’s legal ethics prevent lawyers from advertising their services to potential victims?
In Nigeria, the ethical rules governing the legal profession, as outlined in the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (2007), forbid lawyers from openly advertising their services. Specifically, Rule 39(1) states, “A lawyer shall not engage or be involved in any advertising or promotion of his practice of the law which is calculated to attract clients or personal advertisement.” This rule, rooted in the desire to maintain professionalism, is intended to prevent lawyers from appearing as profit-driven or diminishing the dignity of the legal profession.
In contrast, in countries like the United States, lawyers are not only allowed to advertise, but they do so extensively, using television, radio, billboards, and social media. In fact, the ability to reach potential clients through advertising is fundamental to the functioning of the U.S. legal system. American lawyers, especially those involved in personal injury and class action lawsuits, often run campaigns to inform the public about their rights and recruit plaintiffs who may not even know they have a legal case.
One might ask: does this mean the U.S. legal system is unethical? What is wrong with a lawyer saying, “I represent victims of faulty medical devices or unsafe products—if you have been harmed, call me”? Is there anything inherently unethical about a lawyer openly offering to help victims of injustice seek redress?
The Case for Legal Advertising in Nigeria
In the wake of frequent tanker explosions and other preventable disasters, it is high time Nigeria revisits its stance on legal advertising. These accidents, often involving dangerous and poorly maintained petrol tankers, repeatedly claim lives and destroy communities. Yet, victims and their families are often left unaware of their legal rights or the possibility of holding those responsible accountable.
By allowing lawyers to advertise their services, especially in class action lawsuits, Nigeria could offer victims a chance to seek justice. A class action lawsuit, where a group of people with similar claims is represented by one or more plaintiffs, provides an opportunity for victims to band together, share legal costs, and apply pressure on negligent parties. This could be a powerful tool in holding companies accountable for the hazardous practices that lead to disasters.
In America, companies are highly cautious when it comes to safety standards because they fear the financial and reputational consequences of class action lawsuits. These lawsuits are often fueled by advertising campaigns that recruit victims, making it easier to build a strong case. The fear of such collective legal action incentivizes businesses to adopt better safety measures, reducing the risk of accidents. The Nigerian legal system could benefit from a similar dynamic.
The Ethical Debate: Balancing Professionalism and Public Good
While the ban on advertising is rooted in the noble intention of maintaining the dignity of the legal profession, it raises the question of whether this restriction does more harm than good in certain cases. The reality is that many Nigerians who suffer from corporate negligence or government oversight failures are unaware of their rights or the legal recourse available to them. Allowing lawyers to advertise could bridge this knowledge gap and provide victims with access to justice.
Rule 39(2) of the Rules of Professional Conduct allows a lawyer to “announce the opening of his chambers or relocation of his office” in a subdued manner, but this is hardly sufficient to inform the public of their rights in the event of mass harm. Restricting open recruitment for legal representation in class actions only serves to shield negligent companies and institutions from being held accountable. It is not an ethical issue to provide victims with the tools they need to seek justice—it is a moral imperative.
Reforming the Legal Landscape: A Path Forward
For Nigeria to address systemic issues like frequent tanker accidents, reforms are needed in the legal profession. The National Assembly and the Nigerian Bar Association should consider revising the Rules of Professional Conduct to allow for controlled and ethical advertising, especially in cases involving mass harm. This would enable lawyers to inform the public about their legal rights and encourage the use of class action lawsuits to hold negligent parties accountable.
As it stands, many Nigerians are left in the dark about their legal options, while companies that should be held accountable for accidents and other preventable disasters continue to operate with impunity. By allowing lawyers to advertise their services, Nigeria can take a significant step toward improving access to justice for its citizens.
Conclusion
It is time for Nigeria to reconsider its stance on legal advertising, particularly in the context of class action lawsuits. While maintaining the professionalism of the legal practice is crucial, so too is ensuring that victims of negligence and injustice are aware of their rights and can seek redress. The tragedies we witness—like the recent tanker explosion—highlight the urgent need for change. If lawyers were allowed to advertise and recruit victims for class action lawsuits, it could put pressure on negligent companies, reduce accidents, and ultimately save lives.
The Nigerian judiciary and legislature must now take steps to modernize the legal system, ensuring that it serves the public good while upholding the highest ethical standards.
All copyright Reserved – IKENNA EMMANUEL 2024-October
Ikenna Emmanuel & Co
( LEADS Law FIRM) +2348035003594